<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Source code is the best form of documentation (not)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://t-machine.org/index.php/2007/09/14/source-code-is-the-best-form-of-documentation-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://t-machine.org/index.php/2007/09/14/source-code-is-the-best-form-of-documentation-not/</link>
	<description>Internet Gaming, Computer Games, Technology, MMO, and Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:26:58 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fiordean Dacian</title>
		<link>http://t-machine.org/index.php/2007/09/14/source-code-is-the-best-form-of-documentation-not/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiordean Dacian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmachine1.dh.bytemark.co.uk/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/source-code-is-the-best-form-of-documentation-not/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Now that&#039;s an interesting point of view, I didn&#039;t think about it.

I just want to add a point: documenting an existing system is just boring. Writing unit tests is more valuable.

I had to document an already existing application some time ago and generate some html out of it. The odd thing was that I wasn&#039;t the creator of that application, and the programmers who wrote the code were not part of the team anymore. I did it because I was paid for it, but I&#039;m sure it was wrong, useless and man, boring. Now in this case I think your scenario fits like a glow and unit tests come might really help.

Dacian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that&#8217;s an interesting point of view, I didn&#8217;t think about it.</p>
<p>I just want to add a point: documenting an existing system is just boring. Writing unit tests is more valuable.</p>
<p>I had to document an already existing application some time ago and generate some html out of it. The odd thing was that I wasn&#8217;t the creator of that application, and the programmers who wrote the code were not part of the team anymore. I did it because I was paid for it, but I&#8217;m sure it was wrong, useless and man, boring. Now in this case I think your scenario fits like a glow and unit tests come might really help.</p>
<p>Dacian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://t-machine.org/index.php/2007/09/14/source-code-is-the-best-form-of-documentation-not/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 03:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tmachine1.dh.bytemark.co.uk/blog/index.php/2007/09/14/source-code-is-the-best-form-of-documentation-not/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>(all due to a conversation I had with JT (?) where this came up and it seemed worth retelling to a wider audience...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(all due to a conversation I had with JT (?) where this came up and it seemed worth retelling to a wider audience&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
