<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-aliasing fonts is really stupid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://t-machine.org/index.php/2008/03/21/anti-aliasing-fonts-is-really-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://t-machine.org/index.php/2008/03/21/anti-aliasing-fonts-is-really-stupid/</link>
	<description>Internet Gaming, Computer Games, Technology, MMO, and Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:26:58 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://t-machine.org/index.php/2008/03/21/anti-aliasing-fonts-is-really-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-2093</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t-machine.org/index.php/2008/03/21/anti-aliasing-fonts-is-really-stupid/#comment-2093</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s largely because the colour black (which is really &quot;dark white&quot;) does not exist even in the real world, and is instead made up of a shade of red, a shade of blue, and one or two shades of green/yellow.

This does not change the fact that humans see &quot;black&quot; as a colour distinct from, say, &quot;red&quot;.

Nor does it change the fact that if you display &quot;red&quot; when you are supposed to be displaying &quot;black&quot;, on a good-enough monitor it is highly noticeable to a human with good eyesight as being &quot;not black&quot;.

You apparently have Missed the Point of the entire exercise - both the fundamental properties of light as perceived by the human eye, and the fact that monitor/display technology has improved vastly over the last 20 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s largely because the colour black (which is really &#8220;dark white&#8221;) does not exist even in the real world, and is instead made up of a shade of red, a shade of blue, and one or two shades of green/yellow.</p>
<p>This does not change the fact that humans see &#8220;black&#8221; as a colour distinct from, say, &#8220;red&#8221;.</p>
<p>Nor does it change the fact that if you display &#8220;red&#8221; when you are supposed to be displaying &#8220;black&#8221;, on a good-enough monitor it is highly noticeable to a human with good eyesight as being &#8220;not black&#8221;.</p>
<p>You apparently have Missed the Point of the entire exercise &#8211; both the fundamental properties of light as perceived by the human eye, and the fact that monitor/display technology has improved vastly over the last 20 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silly wabbit.</title>
		<link>http://t-machine.org/index.php/2008/03/21/anti-aliasing-fonts-is-really-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-2092</link>
		<dc:creator>Silly wabbit.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t-machine.org/index.php/2008/03/21/anti-aliasing-fonts-is-really-stupid/#comment-2092</guid>
		<description>It’s doing it by changing the colours of the text as well, which IS noticeable to most people - black-on-white text is actually rendered as “black+red+blue text on white”.

Man! Are you sitting down! Because I have even more *SCANDALOUS* information for you!

I have a *SHOCKING* revelation for you... The text is actually rendered without any black at all! Even something that looks black is made of red green and blue. Stunning, I know! 

Even worse, TV makers have been tricking us like this since the 1950&#039;s! - using ***EVEN*** ***BLURRIER*** screens, where the pixels don&#039;t even line up! 

More shockingly, the evil madmen have been using a trick called &quot;Interlacing&quot; an insidious technique where the pixels are lined up in a triangular pattern so that they can get away with ripping us off by only sending half a picture at a time!

What are they trying to do to our brains?!?!?!?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s doing it by changing the colours of the text as well, which IS noticeable to most people &#8211; black-on-white text is actually rendered as “black+red+blue text on white”.</p>
<p>Man! Are you sitting down! Because I have even more *SCANDALOUS* information for you!</p>
<p>I have a *SHOCKING* revelation for you&#8230; The text is actually rendered without any black at all! Even something that looks black is made of red green and blue. Stunning, I know! </p>
<p>Even worse, TV makers have been tricking us like this since the 1950&#8217;s! &#8211; using ***EVEN*** ***BLURRIER*** screens, where the pixels don&#8217;t even line up! </p>
<p>More shockingly, the evil madmen have been using a trick called &#8220;Interlacing&#8221; an insidious technique where the pixels are lined up in a triangular pattern so that they can get away with ripping us off by only sending half a picture at a time!</p>
<p>What are they trying to do to our brains?!?!?!?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
