<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eclipse v3.5 / OS X: Breaking the fonts is &#8220;non optional&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://t-machine.org/index.php/2009/10/29/eclipse-v3-5-os-x-when-sadistic-bastards-make-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://t-machine.org/index.php/2009/10/29/eclipse-v3-5-os-x-when-sadistic-bastards-make-software/</link>
	<description>Internet Gaming, Computer Games, Technology, MMO, and Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:35:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Weigel</title>
		<link>http://t-machine.org/index.php/2009/10/29/eclipse-v3-5-os-x-when-sadistic-bastards-make-software/comment-page-1/#comment-3274</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Weigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t-machine.org/?p=711#comment-3274</guid>
		<description>So... what is your magical monitor? When I zoom into the image I see the difference, when I look at it on my 15.1&quot;, 1680x1050 Thinkpad (so fairly high ppi) the bottom looks *vastly* better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; what is your magical monitor? When I zoom into the image I see the difference, when I look at it on my 15.1&#8243;, 1680&#215;1050 Thinkpad (so fairly high ppi) the bottom looks *vastly* better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wendy</title>
		<link>http://t-machine.org/index.php/2009/10/29/eclipse-v3-5-os-x-when-sadistic-bastards-make-software/comment-page-1/#comment-3272</link>
		<dc:creator>wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t-machine.org/?p=711#comment-3272</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll just say that I&#039;m reading this blog post on a 15&quot; macbook pro and the second version is much easier to read. Of course on other monitors ... it&#039;s true, anti-aliasing can be a bad thing if the text is too large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll just say that I&#8217;m reading this blog post on a 15&#8243; macbook pro and the second version is much easier to read. Of course on other monitors &#8230; it&#8217;s true, anti-aliasing can be a bad thing if the text is too large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://t-machine.org/index.php/2009/10/29/eclipse-v3-5-os-x-when-sadistic-bastards-make-software/comment-page-1/#comment-3256</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t-machine.org/?p=711#comment-3256</guid>
		<description>LOL.

If your graphics card has one of those gimmicky magnifying glass modes you can see it more clearly (sorry, I should have blown-up a section to make it easier to see). On OS X, you can do a realtime &quot;zoom&quot; by hitting some combination of four keys, cant remember which, sorry.

Or ... find a really sharp LCD monitor: what you think &quot;seems easier to read&quot; will appear noticeably harder to read once the mointor is sharp enough (and/or your eyesight is good enough).

The downside is that it LOOKS MORE PRETTY - which is the main reason that people like Apple try to force you to use it. When you have a cheap LCD monitor, you lose the benefit of sharp text anyway, and it works OK. When you have a decent monitor (pretty cheap these days), you WOULD have sharp text if the software were rendering correctly.

A prime example of the problem is the letter i : because it&#039;s thin, this &quot;improved&quot; rendering from Apple will often render the &quot;i&quot; as &quot;light grey&quot; when all the other text is &quot;black&quot; - because they&#039;re attempting to make the letter average-out to what it would look like on a higher-resolution monitor. Nice idea, but the effect is like reading a very very very cheaply-printed book, one where the letters all have different ink amounts. Nasty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL.</p>
<p>If your graphics card has one of those gimmicky magnifying glass modes you can see it more clearly (sorry, I should have blown-up a section to make it easier to see). On OS X, you can do a realtime &#8220;zoom&#8221; by hitting some combination of four keys, cant remember which, sorry.</p>
<p>Or &#8230; find a really sharp LCD monitor: what you think &#8220;seems easier to read&#8221; will appear noticeably harder to read once the mointor is sharp enough (and/or your eyesight is good enough).</p>
<p>The downside is that it LOOKS MORE PRETTY &#8211; which is the main reason that people like Apple try to force you to use it. When you have a cheap LCD monitor, you lose the benefit of sharp text anyway, and it works OK. When you have a decent monitor (pretty cheap these days), you WOULD have sharp text if the software were rendering correctly.</p>
<p>A prime example of the problem is the letter i : because it&#8217;s thin, this &#8220;improved&#8221; rendering from Apple will often render the &#8220;i&#8221; as &#8220;light grey&#8221; when all the other text is &#8220;black&#8221; &#8211; because they&#8217;re attempting to make the letter average-out to what it would look like on a higher-resolution monitor. Nice idea, but the effect is like reading a very very very cheaply-printed book, one where the letters all have different ink amounts. Nasty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whaledawg</title>
		<link>http://t-machine.org/index.php/2009/10/29/eclipse-v3-5-os-x-when-sadistic-bastards-make-software/comment-page-1/#comment-3254</link>
		<dc:creator>whaledawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://t-machine.org/?p=711#comment-3254</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t see the blurryness, but the second one does seem easier to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t see the blurryness, but the second one does seem easier to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
