Conferences don’t make these public.
But they should.
So … here are the evaluations (from the audience) for our panel session at AGDC 09.
Judge for yourself whether you want to attend any future sessions featuring us again (Adam Martin, Bill Dalton, Rick Lambright, Joe Ludwig, Marty Poulin).
Head Count: 74; Evaluations: 32 (43% response rate)
- Overall rating of the presentation – 88% (AVG: 86%)
- How relevant was the topic to you? – 86% (AVG: 84%)
- How well did this class meet your expectations? – 94% (AVG: 84%)
- Would you recommend this session to a colleague? – 90% (AVG: 84%)
- Evaluate the speakers’ ability to communicate – 94% (AVG: 86%)
- If there were visual aids (slides) how were they? – 74% (AVG: 60%)
All of those are above average, and I’m glad that a particularly high number would recommend the session to their colleagues.
It seems that we did particularly well on fulfilling the remit (very high number for “met expectations”), and that our speakers had an awesome ability to communicate (almost 10% higher than average for the other speakers at the conference).
- The most entertaining session I attended, but didn’t sacrifice information value.
- Interesting format, I wouldn’t mind seeing more of this, but it is time consuming
- Good stuff
- Slow, confused start lost valuable time for Q&A
- Should have done middleware
- Only 3 topics covered. Expected others
Comment 4 – yeah, something I’m unhappy about too, (it wasn’t our fault, it was the people running the conference), but there was nothing for it but to grin and carry on. Someone screwed-up the radio microphones, and we lost a lot of time at the start waiting for them to fix it. There was nothing we could do – they had connected the mics from a different room to *our* speakers. We didn’t find out until the person in the other room started talking, and it all came out through our speakers :(.
Comment 6 – we covered 4 topics (oops, audience can’t count :P). We all wanted to do more, but at GDC conferences, the organizers only give us 1-hour slots. With 4 speakers + moderator, I think that was pretty good, especially considering the time we lost at the start.
Perhaps someone will clone this format for a future conference (seems a good idea), and try to get a 2-hour slot for it?